What should the conclusion of an SOP include?

The conclusion of a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) should effectively summarize the key aspects of the document and ensure clarity regarding its implementation. Including a review schedule and references in the conclusion helps in establishing a clear framework for how often the SOP will be evaluated for effectiveness and compliance, as well as providing sources for further information or guidelines that may support the SOP. This approach ensures that users understand the importance of regular review and the context of the procedures outlined within the SOP, promoting consistency and adherence to best practices.

While other options may include information that could be relevant in specific contexts, they do not fulfill the primary purpose of the conclusion in an SOP. Examples of past failures may offer insight but are more appropriately addressed in a different section focused on lessons learned or risk management, rather than the conclusion. Contact information for external audits might be relevant to certain procedures, but it does not form part of the concluding remarks reflective of the SOP's aims and utility. Personal opinions have no place in an SOP conclusion, as SOPs are intended to be objective and based on established protocols rather than personal perspectives.