Which of the following is NOT a consideration in evaluating risk versus gain?

In evaluating risk versus gain, the consideration that is not typically part of the analysis is the cost of equipment. The focus of this evaluation centers more on the safety implications, operational efficiency, and potential for harm when assessing risks in various scenarios.

Safety protocols are crucial as they establish the guidelines and measures necessary to mitigate risks and ensure the well-being of personnel and the environment. Operational efficiency relates to how effectively a process runs, considering the potential gains that may not justify the risks involved. The potential for harm addresses the severity and likelihood of negative outcomes resulting from an action or decision, which is a critical aspect of risk assessment.

While the cost of equipment can impact an organization's budget and operational decisions, it does not directly influence the risk versus gain evaluation in terms of safety and operational outcomes. This perspective highlights that the intrinsic value and implications of risk assessment focus more on human safety and operational integrity rather than the financial investment in equipment.